Demagogy's Far Left Mentality. By Uncle Monty.

Demagogy's Far Left Mentality.

By Uncle Monty.

<>
Being against further mass immigration to Britain,
seeking to have the Union Jack hoisted over London’s
City Hall, demanding a ban on burkas in public buildings,
opposing inter-racial dating, courting, and intercourse;
discouraging multi-ethnic marriages, and supporting the
tightening-up of rules to prevent further abuses by so-
called “asylum seekers,” does not, in and of itself, make
a person who seeks or supports such crucial remedies a
fascist. Yet, those who express such views are easily and
quickly branded as fascists by those who are themselves
caught-up in their own demagogy’s far-left mentality.
<>
A good example of such a mentality is what is going on right
now with the loud-mouthed organisers and riff-raff members
of “Love Music Hate Racism” (LMHR) and “Unite Against
Fascism” (UAF) that wants now to force out the lawful and
openly-elected Richard Barnbrook of the British National
Party (BNP) to the London Assembly.
<>

Neither the far-left nor the far-right represents me as an
independent voter and I would not vote for neither. But if such
a representative from any political extreme is duly elected by
the votes of the people then nobody and no organization should be
allowed to try to unlawfully and undemocratically unseat the duly
elected. That’s precisely what the LMHR and UAF are trying to
do against Richard Barnbrook because they don’t like his views
and/or the organization he represents. Some 130.000 Londoners

voted for him and his organization whether we like it or not
and whether or not it fits neatly into the LMHR and UAF
political mindset and its demagogy’s far-left mentality. Not a
single representative of LMHR and UAF is duly elected by the
people in any assembly that I am aware of. So who are they to
rant and rave about someone who is elected? And, who are they
to try to also dangerously thwart the will of the people by
acts of intimidation and affront against Richard Barnbrook?
It matters not if he is a fascist or not or a bleeding heart
liberal or not or a blue-blooded Tory or not or an anarchist
or not, for it matters only if the person was democratically
elected under the rules in place for all manner of views
and ideologies to be voted in or out by the people.
<>
Richard Barnbrook was voted in, not voted out-like
was the daring of the far left called Ken Livingstone.
Perhaps that’s why the far left’s LMHR and UAF wants

to now protest the certified election of a far right cand-
idate like Barnbrook because their own shyster and

jackass candidate Red Ken lost badly? Whatever, the

casted votes of The People must stand no matter what.
<>
Those who don’t like the positions and beliefs of the
British National Party, or any politicial party for that

matter, should run against them and get themselves

duly elected by lawful means such as at the next national

British General Election to be held by 1210. Or the next

local London Mayoral Election set for 2012 or at some

by-election. If then duly elected to office, would they
expect as far left members to be forced out of office by
organised protests against them by the far right?

I think not – period.
<>
The problem with all extreme political parties, be they

from the far left to far right, is that they thrive on, and
revel in, their own kind of flapdoodle fascism and didactic
demagogy that they always, at some point, accuse the other of.

The commonality of extreme parties is that they are always

extreme-and no matter what their political posture and stated

aim may be. I trust no extremes to guide me or to give my vote

to at any given election. But if the people choose otherwise to

override my vote by voting in a representative of some

extreme party or ideology, then so let it be ...
<>
:: Mark Saunders ::

And so let’s forget for now Richard Barnbrook and BNP,
for if you want to see the real rise of modern day British
Fascism-then look no further than at the latest police slaughter,
just days ago, of top law barrister Mark Saunders at age 32
by the dreadful and trigger-happy firearms squad dubbed
CO19. They’re the same police thugs who also last slaughtered
the innocent Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes at age 27. If
you look at the police outfits of CO19, they could best be
described as modern-day Nazi Storm Troopers. Their para-
military outfits and their lethal equipment are American-
made, by the way.

.
:: A CO19 armed cop ::

In fact, the global rise of more and more police killings
against civilians from Britain to Burma, from China to America,
from Zimbabwe to Iraq, and from the Occupied Terrorities to
Parkistan, is a growing menace like classical fascism at which
the individual is killed at the slaughterous hands of their own
local or national police. Oftentimes, such killings are based
on the pure whim or made-up pretext of the gun-toting cop.
“Lawless are they who make their will their law,” said William
Shakespeare. Police killings are exactly that in all too many
instances. All I am waiting for is to see a black kid killed by
our armed British police and then all hell will probably be let
loose by other protesting blacks on the streets of London or
elsewhere at Albion. So far, eight whites have been police-killed
in England since 2005 and by the police thuggery of CO19.
<>
The police killing of the young British barrister Mark Saunders
in the swanky neighbourhood of London's Chelsea carries all the
vile hallmarks of American police behaviour and their SWAT
teams, which I believe Britian's CO19 is strictly modelled on.
Their attitude, like their American counterparts, is to kill first
and ask questions later. They have absolutely no empathy
towards those who they kill in cold blood. They probably
gave themselves "High Fives" after their latest killing of
Mark Saunders. That's how cold and brutal they are.

http://www.eliteukforces.info/police/CO19/
<>
Like US SWAT Teams, Britian's CO19 is fundamentally a
law unto itself. And all police killings against civilians are an
expression of that and no matter the rationale given by the
authorities for such lethal and fatal police acts. Armed police
members of squad CO19 may grow into a kind of unofficial
British “Death Squad” as they prowl the streets of London
looking to see who they can “lawfully kill.” That's if steps
aren't quickly taken to curtail and contain their powers
to shoot to kill and to do pretty much what they want
under British anti-terrorism laws that New Labour has
inflicted on the British people. No doubt we’ll be told all
kinds of bad things about the dead Mark Saunders to
help justify yet another police killing by CO19. Once you
arm the police, nobody is safe from them. Because they’ll
kill you as readily as Jean Charles de Menezes and Mark
Saunders and those others they've been allowed to
kill. It matters not whether you’re innocent or not, if
they decide to kill you for whatever reason they want.
<>
So let us also now forget those riff raff adherents of demagogy’s
far left mentality and focus instead on the real rise and spread
of police killings in Britain that was once a nation without such
armed police. As the police are more widely-armed, then
civilians also get more guns to "protect" themselevs from the
police. Thus, we're already like an American state where
we cannot move for those with guns either from the police
or criminal elements at the street level. What the present
government needs to do is to take urgent and concreete
steps to immediately curb the free license and firepower
of the British police to kill in the name of modern law en-
forcement and security. Such smacks so often of little more
than violent and open fascism in what they are allowed to
do against others by just killing them out right like Nazi
Storm Troopers of the far right. Or at the opposite extreme,
like gun carrying members of the far left cadre that I saw

with my own eyes while I was inside the old communist
dictatorship of North Korea’s capital of Pyongyang.
<>
With the unfolding story of the tragic slaughter by
CO19 of young Mark Saunders, I shall probably write an
in-depth piece on what they tell us of what supposedly
happened. We can be sure of patent untruths about him,
just like what the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir
Ian Blair first stated about the reasons why his armed
police killed innocent Jean Charles de Menezes. Police
killings are far more important to the downgrading of
the quality of our life and freedom than all the talk and
squabble about BNP, LMHR, and UAF. Beware of de-
magogy's far left and far right mentalities, along with
watching very closely what our police do in reality.
<>
Regards, Uncle Monty.
+Thursday before Whitsuntide, 2oo8.